Categories
Comparison Guides Guides Miscellaneous Power Generators

WEN DF475 vs DuroMax XP4400EH

Today, we live in a world where electricity is everything. The thought of living an entire day without electricity is enough to push even the most patient of us into a never-ending spiral of hopeless and despair. In order to avoid unexpected power outages, it’s a good idea to have a portable generator on hand. Better yet, it’s best to have a dual-fuel portable generator, namely one that runs off of both gasoline and liquid petroleum.

WEN DF475 vs DuroMax XP4400EH: Dual Fuel Portable Generators

WEN DF475

Two companies that make some of the most competitive dual-fuel generators are WEN and DuroMax. In this article, we’re going to take a look at two products – the WEN DF475 and the DuroMax XP4400EH. Both of these machines provide a tremendous amount of power; more than enough to get your home’s most vital appliances and electronics up and running. To find out which of the two would make a better investment for your home, let’s dive right into our comparison.



Gasoline – Surge and Running Wattages

WEN DF475
Some dual-fuel generators produce different surge and running wattages depending on the fuel source. In most cases, you’ll find that these machines can supply greater amounts of power when switched to the gasoline mode. The WEN is rated to supply 4,750 surging watts and 3,800 running watts. It’s not enough to power an entire household, but it’s more than enough for tailgating, traveling, and keeping the most essential appliances – e.g. fridges and WIFI routers – on.

DuroMax XP4400EH vs WEN DF475: Dual Fuel Portable Generators

DuroMax XP4400EH

DuroMax XP4400EH
The DuroMax produces up to 4,400 surge watts and 3,500 running watts. This isn’t very far off of what the WEN can provide, and in many cases, a 300- to 500-watt deficiency won’t be the end of the world. In fact, it’s still enough for traveling purposes and keeping your home’s lights on during emergency situations.

Conclusion: We honestly feel that when it comes to portable generators, more is better since it offers more freedom in deciding which appliances to run. That being said, we don’t see that much of a difference between the two machines in terms of surge and running wattages when using gasoline. Of course, getting a portable generator depends entirely on your own set of unique requirements, and we’re not in any position to decide whether more or less is better for you.

Liquid Propane – Surge and Running Wattages

WEN DF475
As we mentioned earlier, gasoline is more likely than not the more efficient fuel source for generators. The WEN, when running off of propane, has slightly reduced surge and wattage ratings – 4,350 and 3,500 watts respectively – compared to using gasoline mode. Still, it’s not that much of a difference and will still supply your home with sufficient power to get through frustrating blackouts.

WEN DF475 vs DuroMax XP4400EH

WEN DF475

DuroMax XP4400EH
The DuroMax is one of the few models whose engines work at the same efficiency level when fueled by both gasoline and liquid propane. You won’t find any dips in power supply when switching between gasoline mode and propane mode. This machine still supplies 4,400 surge watts and 3,500 running watts in any situation.

Conclusion: We like how there’s no loss of power when switching between gas and liquid propane modes in the DuroMax. However, even with the WEN’s reduced power, we notice that there’s hardly any difference. Really, how is a 50-watt deficit going to make a difference in the grand scheme of things?

Gasoline – Run Time

WEN DF475
Each source of fuel provides different total run times per full tank of gas or propane. In general, gasoline is the more efficient option which you’ll see also stands true when looking at both of these models. On a full 4-gallon tank of gas, the WEN has a maximum run time of 11 hours at 50% capacity (1,900 watts).

DuroMax XP4400EH
The DuroMax, on a full tank of gas (also 4 gallons), can provide up to 8 hours of power at half capacity, or about 1,750 watts. This is far from being the average level of efficiency since most 4,000-plus-watt machines with 4-gallon tanks can supply power for upwards of 10 hours at half-load.

Conclusion: By looking at their respective maximum run times on a full 4-gallon tank, it’s clear that the WEN is the more fuel-efficient model. While using the same amount of gas, you can get at least 3 hours of extra electricity with the WEN than the DuroMax. It’s a shame that the DuroMax doesn’t even meet the 10-hour minimum that we expect from modern portable generators.

DuroMax XP4400EH vs WEN DF475

DuroMax XP4400EH

Liquid Propane – Run Time

WEN DF475
We mentioned earlier that propane is generally the less efficient option in terms of being a source of fuel for portable generators. It’s especially apparent in this WEN model that delivers up to 7 hours of electricity from a single 20-pound tank of liquid propane when running at half capacity.

DuroMax XP4400EH
The DuroMax, on the other hand, excels when it comes to using liquid propane to produce electricity. Using that same 20-pound tank of liquid propane, you can expect upwards of 10 hours when supplying up to 1,750 watts continuously. This is about the average time you can get from a 4,000-watt liquid propane generator so that’s something to consider.

Conclusion: What the DuroMax lacks when using gasoline to power up, it makes up for when liquid propane is running through the engine. Compared to the WEN, you can get at least 3 additional hours of power when both machines are switched to liquid propane mode. This is especially when a city-wide power outage shuts down all gas pumps.

WEN DF475 vs DuroMax XP4400EH: Dual Fuel Portable Generators

Check how much you can save, buying the WEN DF475 on Amazon >>>

Outlets

WEN DF475 and DuroMax XP4400EH
One of the most important considerations when choosing a generator, whether it be portable or standby, are the types and number of available outlets. Both the WEN and DuroMax come with two standard 120V 3-prong outlets for plugging electronics directly into the machine. You also have the option of plugging these generators straight into your home’s inlet box by means of a 120V/240V L14-30R twist-lock plug. Just be sure you get an outdoor-safe power cord with the proper wire gauge for its length.

Verdict

Dual-fuel portable generators are great since they don’t rely on a single fuel source to provide power. If your local gas station’s pumps aren’t functional for whatever reason, you can change the generator from gasoline to liquid propane mode and pick up a tank of propane to convert into electricity.

Between the two models – the WEN DF475 and the DuroMax XP4400EH – we feel that neither one of them has the obvious upper hand when compared against the other. The WEN excels in gas-economy, whereas the DuroMax has a better propane-usage rate to supply electricity. At the end of the day, it ultimately comes down to whether you’re more likely to rely on gasoline or propane for power. If gasoline is your go-to source of fuel, then the WEN is the better choice. If propane is your thing, then the DuroMax should be the way to go.

DuroMax XP4400EH vs WEN DF475: Dual Fuel Portable Generators

3 Recommended Portable Generators


Bestseller No. 1
WEN 56203i Super Quiet 2000-Watt Portable Inverter...
  • Ultralight body weighs in at a mere 39 pounds for easy transport and storage
  • Extremely quiet operation comparable to the sound of a normal conversation according to the US Department of...
  • Produces 2000 surge watts and 1700 rated watts of clean power for safe charging of sensitive electronics...
SaleBestseller No. 2
DuroMax XP12000EH Dual Fuel 12000 Watt Electric...
  • Powerful DuroMax Engine: the XP12000EH is powered by a DuroMax 18HP, 457cc OHV engine.
  • Dual fuel technology: the ability to run on propane or gasoline allows the freedom and flexibility of fuel...
  • Plenty of power: with 12, 000 starting watts and 9, 500 running watts, This unit can handle heavy loads from...
Bestseller No. 3
A-iPower SUA2000iV Super Quiet 2000-Watt Portable...
  • 2000 peak watt/1600 running watt 1. 1-Gal. Fuel tank. Provides up to 7 hours of run time at 50% load
  • A-iPower exclusive "low idle" Technology enable you a 9 hour run time at 50% load and 4 hour run time at 100%...
  • 58 dBA noise lvl ensures quiet operation so you won't wake up your neighbor & wife, perfert fit for camping,...




Categories
Cleaning Comparison Guides Guides Pressure Washers

Greenworks GPW1702 vs GPW1951 Pressure Washer

The classical way of cleaning our yards and vehicles is with a rag, soap, and garden hose. What you undoubtedly know about garden hoses is that they are extremely inefficient in using water. You can waste hundreds of gallons of water per minute without making a dent in the total mess of your driveways and yards. The most effective and efficient way of clearing the outside of your home from debris – e.g., fallen leaves, mud, and oil spills – is by using an electric pressure washer. These machines can produce tremendous amounts of force for lifting and eliminating the toughest messes.

Greenworks GPW1702 vs GPW1951: Pressure Washer Comparison

Greenworks GPW1702

In this article, we’re going to look at two Greenworks electric pressure washers: the GPW1702 and GPW1951. This company produces some of the most reliable pressure washers, and both of these models can be evidence of this fact. However, when it comes to tools, there can only be one “best” tool to choose from. We’re going to compare these two models with each other and determine which of them provides better value.



PSI and GPM

GPW1702
The most important performance variables to consider are PSI and GPM. PSI provides information on how much power the electric pressure washer can produce, whereas the GPM count indicates how much water the machine uses to reach its maximum PSI rating. The GPW1702 can generate up to 1,700 PSI while consuming 1.2 GPM of water.

GPW1951
As for the GPW1951, it can produce up to 1,950 PSI with 1.2 GPM of water use. We can see a minor difference in maximum pressure, but they use the exact same amount of water in doing so. You can alter the total pressure applied on your home and vehicle by attaching the quick-connect nozzles (more on this later).

Greenworks GPW1951 vs GPW1702 : Pressure Washer Comparison

Greenworks GPW1951

Conclusion: Looking at their PSI ratings, we can conclude that there isn’t going to be a significant difference between the two models. There won’t be that many cleaning tasks that the GPW1951 can do that the GPW1702 can’t. However, when it comes to GPM, we feel that the GPW1951 is the more superior model. It uses less water to produce greater amounts of pressurized water, so you can complete heavy-duty cleaning jobs while consuming less water.

Quick-Connect Nozzles

GPW1702 and GPW1951
There are three ways to alter how much pressure is exerted from the water. The first is with a twisting nozzle which increases and decreases pressure as you turn the nozzle.

The second way by manually altering the total pressure by turning a knob, but this method is rarely found in electric pressure washers. The most common method of changing pressure, and coincidentally the way that these two Greenworks models use, is by attaching quick-connect nozzles to the end of the wand. Both of these tools come with 25° and 40° spray-fan nozzles, so you don’t need to worry about shattering your car’s and home’s windows when washing.

Greenworks GPW1702

Greenworks GPW1702

Soap Nozzle vs Soap Applicator

GPW1702
The best electric pressure washers give users the ability to shoot soap from a tank or dedicated soap bottle. The GPW1702 uses the latter, meaning you’ll need to manually detach the spray wand from the gun in order to mount the soap bottle. Unfortunately, you’re not going to get extremely foamy soap with this method.

GPW1951
One of the main differences between these two models is that the GPW1951 has a built-in soap tank. To shoot soap from the wand, simply attach the third quick-connect nozzle (soap nozzle) to the end of the wand and pull the trigger. To switch back to rinsing mode, re-attach the 25° or 40° nozzle.

Conclusion: Choosing between a separate soap applicator and a built-in soap tank can be difficult, and it all comes down to personal preference. We personally like the built-in tank better than the soap applicator. However, the GPW1951 provides a frothier layer of soap, adding to our overall satisfaction of using an electric pressure washer.

Greenworks GPW1951

Greenworks GPW1951

Hose Reel

GPW1702 and GPW1951
The greatest hassle of using an electric pressure washer is cleaning up when you’re all done. With certain models, you’ll need to manually wrap the hose in order to prevent tearing or ripping and store it in a safe spot in your garage or closet. To simplify the cleanup process, Greenworks has included built-in hose reels to both of these models. To wrap the hose, just turn the hose reel and watch as the hose coils up quickly. In addition, there’s a reduced risk of damage to the hose when using a built-in reel.

Water Intake

GPW1702 and GPW1951
In our opinion, the most amazing thing about these two products is the temperature of the water which these machines can use. Most models limit their users to using cold water (less than 80°F). Anybody who’s ever washed dishes knows that warm and hot water can get rid of greasy, caked-on messes much quicker than cold water. Both the GPW1702 and GPW1951 have a maximum water inlet temperature of 104°. This should be sufficient in eliminating motor oil stains and slippery moss and mildew from your patio.

Greenworks GPW1702 vs GPW1951: Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Greenworks GPW1702 on Amazon >>>

Greenworks GPW1702 vs GPW1951: Verdict

The two main differentiating features between the GPW1702 and GPW1951 are their PSI/GPM ratings and method of applying soap. They produce similar amounts of pressure, but the GPW1951 uses less water in doing so. In the long run, you can end up saving tens, if not hundreds, of gallons of water every year with the GPW1951 while producing better results.

Next, the soap applicator of the Greenworks GPW1702 is just a tad bit unsatisfactory. It’s going to be impossible to apply a layer of thick soap on your vehicles or patio with the soap applicator. As for the GPW1951, the built-in tank and soap nozzle helps is frothing up the soap, making it easier to spread more evenly on whatever surface you’re cleaning.

Admittedly, this is our personal preference and not an entirely objective conclusion. However, the best thing about these Greenworks-made machines is that they can use warm water. Cleaning up oil spills, slippery mildew, and caked-on mud and dirt stains can be dissolved much quicker with warm water, making these two models excellent choices to have at home.

Greenworks GPW1951 vs GPW1702 : Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Greenworks GPW1951 on Amazon >>>



Best Electric Pressure Washer: Buying Guide

Pressure Washer Infographic


Pressure Washers (Recommended)
Sun Joe SPX4000 Stanley SLP2050 Sun Joe SPX3500
Sun Joe Stanley Sun Joe
SPX4000 SLP2050 SPX3500
2030 PSI 2050 PSI 2300 PSI
22 x 18 x 37 in 24.4 x 16.4 x 17.2 in 16.7 x 14.5 x 36 in
27.8 pounds 36.4 pounds 33 pounds




Categories
Cleaning Comparison Guides Guides Pressure Washers

Karcher K2 vs K3 Pressure Washer

Without an electric power washer, the best you can hope when cleaning your driveways, paved walkways, and vehicles is spending hours and hours under the hot, punishing sun. Admittedly, a garden hose can speed up the cleaning process, but it’s not exactly an efficient way of doing so. First of all, there’s hardly any pressure from garden hoses, and they use up tremendous amounts of water – up to 24 gallons per minute.

Karcher K2 vs Karcher K3: Electric Power Pressure Washer Comparison

Karcher K2

Instead, why not invest in an electric pressure washer and reduce your cleaning time to a fraction of what it’d normally take?

There are hundreds of different electric pressure washers to choose from. One of the most popular brands of residential-grade pressure washers is Karcher, a family-owned company based in Germany that is well-known for their high-quality cleaning tools. In this article, we’re going to compare two of their most simple and most budget-friendly electric pressure washers: the Karcher K2 and K3. They have more overlapping specs than differences, but let’s see how they compare.



PSI and GPM

Karcher K2
Before deciding which pressure washer to get, it’s important to know how much pressure it can provide and how much water it uses in doing so. The K2 can deliver up to 1,600 PSI while consuming 1.25 GPM of water. Needless to say, this is considerably more power and water-efficiency than garden hoses.

Karcher K3 vs Karcher K2: Electric Power Pressure Washer Comparison

Karcher K3

Karcher K3
The K3 is slightly more powerful than the K2. It produces up to 1,800 PSI and uses 1.3 GPM of water. We can see a slight increase in water consumption compared to the K2, but this is normal if you’re getting more pressurized force out of your machine.

Conclusion: It’s believed that more force is better when it comes to a pressure washer. In that case, the K3’s 1,800-PSI force delivery would be the better option. However, we feel that there really isn’t that much difference in power when we’re only looking at only 200 PSI. To conclude this segment, both of these machines, PSI-wise and GPM-wise, are great.

Adjustable Pressure

Karcher K2 and K3
Since we’re dealing with thousands of PSI rather than just tens or even hundreds, there’s a huge risk of accidentally shattering windows or stripping your home’s walls or car’s bodies of their delicate paint. In order to overcome this risk, you’ll need to adjust the amount of force and spray area. Both the K2 and K3 come with Vario spray wands which let users adjust the spray’s force and area by twisting the nozzle. You can get 0° pencil-like precision and a wide 40° fan for quick cleaning.

Weight

Karcher K2 and K3
The weight of a pressure washer is important since it can indicate how maneuverable it is. We generally favor lightweight machines, but if they’re too light, then it can cause some balance issues (more on this later). The K2 and K3 weight less than 17 pounds each, so it’s fair to classify these machines as “lightweight.” There is hardly any risk of fatigue when transporting these units to and fro, especially since they come with wheels.

Karcher K2 vs Karcher K3

Karcher K2

Best 2000 PSI Electric Pressure Washers: Buying Guide

Balance

Karcher K2
One of the most frustrating things about using a portable generator is when you’re more than 30 feet away from the machine and it tips over. Stand-up models have this problem, and it’s mainly due to their extreme lightweight and two-wheel design. The K2 is the perfect example of a portable generator having balance issues.

Karcher K3
You might think that the four-wheel – the first-ever portable generator to sit on two front and back wheels – wouldn’t have balance issues like the K2, but unfortunately the opposite is true. Since the K3 is so lightweight, even the slightest tug can rock the unit back and forth. We admit, however, that it does a better job at maintaining balance than the K2.

Conclusion: It’s unfortunate to see two extremely promising pressure washers fail to maintain their balance when tugging slightly at their cords and pressure hoses. We will admit that the four-wheel design of the K3 is impressive and does well when traveling on uneven surfaces like on grass or rocky pathways, but it does tend to tip over far too often.

Dirtblaster Spray Wand

Karcher K2 and K3
Both the K2 and K3 come with an attachable Dirtblaster Spray Wand. What makes this wand unique is that it’s designed to shoot greater blasts of water, increasing the tool’s cleaning power by up to 50% its original effectiveness. Be sure never to use this tool when washing your vehicles or home windows since it will undoubtedly shatter the windows.

Karcher K3 vs Karcher K2

Karcher K3

Soap Delivery

Karcher K2
The K2 is unique in the sense that it doesn’t come with its own detergent tank or applicator. Instead, you need to drop the end of the pressure hose into a separate container of soap and set the Vario wand to low-pressure mode. There have been many complaints about this tool’s method of drawing in and shooting out soap as the engine seems to struggle with viscous detergents.

Karcher K3
The K3 has its own built-in soap tank. Like the K2, you need to adjust the Vario wand to low-pressure before it can draw in soap. However, just like the K2, this unit has a problem with drawing in enough soap to leave a noticeable layer on whatever surface you’re power-cleaning.

Conclusion: Once again, we’re saddened to see that these machines fail another of the most basic tasks you’d expect from a pressure washer. Their inability to pull in enough soap for a satisfactory layer of foam leaves their users wondering whether these machines are actually worth the investment.

Karcher K2 vs Karcher K3: Electric Power Pressure Washer Comparison

Karcher K2 vs K3 vs K4 vs K5: Electric Power Pressure Washer Comparison

Karcher K2 vs K3: Verdict

We have some mixed feelings about both the Karcher K2 and K3. They’re great tools for regular pressure-washing all sorts of surfaces – e.g. getting rid of grime from your patio furniture, eliminating slippery mildew and moss – but their inability to properly apply a thick layer of soap on surfaces leave us questioning the quality of these German-made products. If your driveway is free of motor oil spills and other slippery messes, then you won’t need soap. But if you’re looking to super-clean every surface around your home, you should take a look at other brands and models.

After comparing the two products to each other, we can safely conclude that the K3 is the better option. You get more power, better water efficiency, and a better mix of lightweight and balance. However, if we were to recommend an electric pressure washer, we’d advise taking a look at Sun Joe’s and Greenworks’ pieces of pressure washer art.

Karcher K3 vs Karcher K2: Electric Power Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Karcher K3 on Amazon >>>






Best Electric Pressure Washer: Buying Guide

Pressure Washer Infographic


Pressure Washers (Recommended)
Sun Joe SPX4000 Stanley SLP2050 Sun Joe SPX3500
Sun Joe Stanley Sun Joe
SPX4000 SLP2050 SPX3500
2030 PSI 2050 PSI 2300 PSI
22 x 18 x 37 in 24.4 x 16.4 x 17.2 in 16.7 x 14.5 x 36 in
27.8 pounds 36.4 pounds 33 pounds

Categories
Cleaning Comparison Guides Guides Pressure Washers

AR Blue Clean AR383 vs AR390SS

One of the ways we keep the exterior of our homes and our cars clean is by running a garden hose. You may be aware that running a garden hose for even a few minutes can be expensive.

AR Blue Clean AR383 vs AR390SS: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

AR Blue Clean AR383

We’re talking about more than a hundred gallons spent every 5 minutes, and you’re not even getting enough pressure to blast away slippery mildew and mold from your patios and outdoor furniture. Instead of running a garden hose continuously, why not invest in an electric pressure washerAn electric pressure can produce more than 1,000 PSI while using just a fraction of the water you’d normally use when running a garden hose.

In this article, we’re going to take a look at two of AR Blue Clean’s electric pressure washers: the AR383 and the AR390SS. Although this company may not be as well-known as Sun Joe or Greenworks, they have a line of high-quality pressure washers that are worth taking notice. After comparing these two products, we’ll see which of them performs better and provides the better value.



PSI and GPM

AR383
When shopping for an electric pressure washer, it’s important to know just how much power it packs and water it uses. The AR383 delivers up to 1,900 PSI of pressurized water while using only 1.5 GPM of water. Needless to say, this is considerably more powerful and water-efficient than a garden hose (40 PSI with at LEAST 24 GPM).

AR Blue Clean AR390SS vs AR383: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

AR Blue Clean AR390SS

AR390SS
If you thought the AR383 was efficient, then check out the AR390SS. Although it only produces 2,000 PSI – 100 more PSI than the AR383 – it uses only 1.4 GPM of water. That may not seem like a tremendous difference to some people, but in the long run, you could end up saving hundreds of gallons of water annually.

Conclusion: Very rarely do we find an electric pressure washer that delivers more force than another model while using less water, but when we do, we get very excited. In terms of pressure and water consumption, the AR390SS is definitely the better option between these two models. Basically, the AR390SS uses less water while producing better cleaning results.

Adjustable Spray Wand vs Quick-Connect Nozzle Tips

AR383
Since these tools deliver more than 1,500 PSI of water, it’s important to ensure that you’re not blasting highly concentrated water at delicate surfaces with pencil-like precision. This could end up stripping paint, denting metal furniture frames, and shattering windows. To adjust the pressure, users can fiddle around with the adjustable spray wand. Twisting the nozzle will change the spray angle and pressure. This tool also comes with a second wand for turbo cleaning.

AR390SS
The AR390SS uses a different method to change the amount of pressure shot out the wand. Instead of twisting the nozzle, you get multiple quick-connect nozzle tips which attach to the end of the wand and modifies the spray angle and pressure. This machine comes with a 0° nozzle, a 25° nozzle, a soap nozzle, and a turbo nozzle.

Conclusion: It’s up to the user to determine whether they’d rather use an adjustable wand or quick-connect tips to alter the pressure shot out of the nozzle. We cannot objectively determine which is the better method since it’s more of a personal preference than anything else. Both of these systems are easy to use and takes very little time when twisting the nozzle/swapping out nozzle tips.

AR Blue Clean AR383

AR Blue Clean AR383

Cord and Pressure Hose Lengths

AR383
Since these are corded-electric models, your range of movement will be limited to a certain extent. The AR383 comes with a 20-foot pressure hose and a 35-foot power cord. This will give you a cleaning area of around 9,500 square feet without unplugging and relocating the machine.

AR390SS
The AR390SS comes with a 30-foot pressure hose (10 feet longer than the AR383) and a 35-foot power cord. With these cable and hose lengths, you’ll have an area of around 13,200 square feet to move around in before having to unplug the machine to move around.

Conclusion: The total areas mentioned earlier do not take into account obstacles – e.g., walls and yard layout – that could significantly reduce the total square footage. However, you could eliminate this problem and extend the range of movement of these machines with the help of an outdoor-safe extension cord.

AR Blue Clean AR390SS

AR Blue Clean AR390SS

Detergent Tank and Soap Application

AR383
The AR383 comes with a single 14-ounce detergent tank. In order to shoot foam out of the wand, you need to change the wand’s pressure to its lowest setting. Unfortunately, there have been several comments about this tool’s slight inability to draw in viscous soap and apply a thick layer of foam.

AR390SS
The AR390SS comes with a humungous 48-ounce detergent tank. To shoot soap out of the wand’s nozzle, simply attach the soap quick-connect nozzle tip and pull the trigger. Since you don’t need to play around with the pressure, this tool shoots out a satisfactory amount of frothy, frothy soap.

Conclusion: The only recommendation we have about the AR390SS’s detergent tank is that it only comes with a single tank. It would have been nice to see two 24-ounce tanks rather than a single 48-ounce one, but as is, it’s still a fine unit. In addition, it does a better job of drawing in viscous soaps and shooting out thick layers of suds.

AR Blue Clean AR383 vs AR390SS: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the AR Blue Clean AR383 on Amazon >>>

AR Blue Clean AR383 vs AR390SS: Verdict

If you’ve read our comparison of the AR Blue Clean AR383 and AR390SS in full, then it should come as no surprise that the AR390SS is the better option to go with between the two AR Blue Clean models.

First, it delivers more power while using less water. Second, it gives you a wider range of movement with its longer pressure hose, though you can extend the AR383’s range with a reliable, outdoor-safe extension cord.

Finally, the AR390SS does a significantly better job at applying suds than the AR383’s lower pressure system. Basically, the AR390SS is better equipped to tackle the toughest cleaning tasks with little to no hiccups while cleaning.

AR Blue Clean AR390SS vs AR383: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the AR Blue Clean AR390SS on Amazon >>>



Best Electric Pressure Washer: Buying Guide

Pressure Washer Infographic


Pressure Washers (Recommended)
Sun Joe SPX4000 Stanley SLP2050 Sun Joe SPX3500
Sun Joe Stanley Sun Joe
SPX4000 SLP2050 SPX3500
2030 PSI 2050 PSI 2300 PSI
22 x 18 x 37 in 24.4 x 16.4 x 17.2 in 16.7 x 14.5 x 36 in
27.8 pounds 36.4 pounds 33 pounds




Categories
Cleaning Comparison Guides Guides Pressure Washers

Sun Joe SPX1000 vs Greenworks GPW1501

Sun Joe SPX1000 vs Greenworks GPW1501

Want to get rid of layers of slippery mildew from your deckWhat about the caked-on carbonized bits stuck to your grill’s gratesInstead of spending hours and hours manually scraping, scrubbing, and hosing down these surfaces, why not employ the assistance of an electric pressure washerThis is the must-have tool for eliminating all sort of nasty stains from around your home. In just a fraction of the time, you can spray highly concentrated jets of water at your driveways, patios, and even the exterior wall of your home to give them a clean sheen you could never achieve by using a traditional garden hose.

Sun Joe SPX1000 vs Greenworks GPW1501: Comparison

Sun Joe SPX1000

In this article, we’re going to take a look at two electric pressure washer models that have garnered a considerably high amount of thumbs-ups. These are the SPX1000 from Sun Joe and the GPW1501 from Greenworks. Both of these machines provide enough power for tackling some of the toughest jobs, but which of these models should you get to clean your walkways and vehiclesKeep reading to find out!

PSI and GPM Ratings

Sun Joe SPX1000
The PSI rating refers to how much power a pressure washer can produce, whereas the GPM rating shows how much water is consumed per minute to provide said power. The Sun Joe’s 11.5-amp motor can produce up to 1,450 PSI at 1.45 GPM. Compared to traditional garden hoses, you’re getting more than 20 times as much force while saving almost 70 times more water.

Greenworks GPW1501
If you thought the Sun Joe’s PSI and GPM ratings were impressive, then prepare to have your jaw drop even further. The Greenworks can generate up to 1,500 PSI at 1.2 GPM. Ok, in all honesty, you’re not going to notice a 50-PSI difference, but in the long run, you can save considerably more on your water bill if you get the Greenworks.

Conclusion: PSI-wise, both of these machines perform similarly. The magic behind the Greenworks is how little water it uses while technically producing more force per square inch of highly concentrated water. A 0.25-GPM difference might seem like nothing, but you could possibly end up saving a hundred dollars or more on water by getting the Greenworks opposed to picking up the Sun Joe.

Greenworks GPW1501 vs Sun Joe SPX1000: Comparison

Greenworks GPW1501

Best 2000 PSI Electric Pressure Washers: Buying Guide

Adjustable Spray wand vs Quick-Connect Nozzle Tips

Sun Joe SPX1000
Unlike so many other models from Sun Joe, the SPX1000 comes with an adjustable wand where users can select how much pressure to blast out of the wand. By twisting the wand, you can choose from a range between 0° pencil-like precision and 40° wide spray area.

Greenworks GPW1501
The Greenworks comes with two (ONLY two!) quick-connect nozzle tips. They provide 25° and 40° fans. With the 25°, you can clear your patios of moss, mildew, and lift oil stains from your driveway. Using the 40° tip, you can clean more delicate surfaces such as the paint on your vehicle’s and your home’s windows. However, since there is no 0° or even 15° tips, precision cleaning might be an issue.

Conclusion: There are several ways you can alter the total pressure produced by an electric pressure washer. The Sun Joe’s adjustable wand allows users to choose their desired pressure by twisting the nozzle to select from between super-concentrated 0° to an ultra-light 40° and beyond. The Greenworks gives you two quick-connect nozzles: a 25° and a 40° option. You don’t even have the freedom to blast jets with pencil-like precision for the toughest cleaning jobs.

Sun Joe SPX1000

Sun Joe SPX1000

Weight

Sun Joe SPX1000
Fully assembled, the Sun Joe weighs an impressive 9.2 pounds. For such a high-power machine, it’s surprising to see that an electric pressure washer can actually weigh less than 10 pounds. Furthermore, the Sun Joe comes with a set of attachable wheels and a handle to help move the unit to and fro.

Greenworks GPW1501
Unlike the Sun Joe, the Greenworks doesn’t feature any wheels. You might not actually need them since the unit only weighs about 17 pounds after assembly. This is almost twice as heavy as the Sun Joe, but honestly speaking, it’s not going to weigh you down.

Conclusion: Both of these machines are celebrated for being extremely lightweight. This is great since, even with the Sun Joe’s handle, it might be a bit too short to roll around on its hind wheels. Between the 9.2-pound Sun Joe and the 17-pound Greenworks, we feel that you there’s hardly any difference in terms of portability, and neither of these models should result in fatigue or muscle aches when maneuvering them around your home.

Greenworks GPW1501

Greenworks GPW1501

Total Stop System

Sun Joe SPX1000
The Total Stop System (TSS) is a system which automatically turns the engine of a pressure washer off in order to save electricity. As soon as you release the trigger, the TSS will kick into gear and stop the engine from further pressurizing water. Additionally, the TSS will actually extend the lifespan of the Sun Joe’s engine by preventing it from working needlessly.

Greenworks GPW1501
The Greenworks does not have a TSS. Without a TSS, the pressure washer’s engine has a higher risk of burning out on you after several months of use. One way to prevent the engine from needlessly re-pressurizing water is by unplugging the machine as soon as possible after you’ve completed your cleaning tasks.

Conclusion: The TSS is designed to help extend the life of a pressure washer’s engine and reduce the electricity costs of operating a pressure washer. Essentially, the TSS kills the engine and prevents it from producing pressurized water when the trigger is disengaged. Unfortunately, the Greenworks doesn’t have such a system in place, so whatever savings you can get from its low GPM might actually be spent on electricity.

Soap Applicator

Sun Joe SPX1000
One of the most surprising things about the Sun Joe is that it doesn’t come with a soap applicator! You need to purchase this item separately! Basically, without a soap applicator, clearing oily spills off your driveway can be a hassle since you need to manually apply a few drops of soap before spraying it clean.

Greenworks GPW1501
The Greenworks comes with a detergent bottle attachment that you place on the gun handle. First, you need to remove the wand and tip before screwing on the soap applicator. The Greenworks then sprays a thin coating of soap at low pressure. To rinse it off, you’ll need to detach the soap applicator and reattach the wand.

Conclusion: Soap tanks or applicators are one of the main reasons for getting a pressure washer. There’s hardly any purpose of cleaning your car with a pressure washer if you need to apply soap to the body of your vehicle manually. However, if you get the Sun Joe, you can purchase a soap applicator separately. It’s a shame that it doesn’t come with the machine…

Sun Joe SPX1000 vs Greenworks GPW1501: Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Sun Joe SPX1000 on Amazon >>>

Sun Joe vs Greenworks: Verdict

The only feature where the Sun Joe outclasses the Greenworks is with its fully adjustable nozzle for high-pressure 0° and low-pressure 40° cleaning. The TSS is also a handy feature, but it’s not a must-have to ensure a long lifespan of your pressure washer’s engine.

In our opinion, the Greenworks is the more superior model for two major reasons. First, it produces more pressure (50 PSI more, to be exact) while consuming less water (1.2 GPM compared to the Sun Joe’s 1.45-GPM rating). Second, the kit includes a soap applicator. We were surprised to see that Sun Joe actually makes you purchase a soap applicator separately from the model. Between these two models, hands down, we feel that the Greenworks GWP1501 is the option to choose.

Greenworks GPW1501 vs Sun Joe SPX1000: Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Greenworks GPW1501 on Amazon >>>



Best Electric Pressure Washer: Buying Guide

Pressure Washer Infographic


Pressure Washers (Recommended)
Sun Joe SPX4000 Stanley SLP2050 Sun Joe SPX3500
Sun Joe Stanley Sun Joe
SPX4000 SLP2050 SPX3500
2030 PSI 2050 PSI 2300 PSI
22 x 18 x 37 in 24.4 x 16.4 x 17.2 in 16.7 x 14.5 x 36 in
27.8 pounds 36.4 pounds 33 pounds




Categories
Cleaning Comparison Guides Guides Pressure Washers

PowerFit vs. Karcher Surface Cleaner

Pressure washers are the best machines you can use for cleaning driveways and patios. However, with the standard gun and wand, you’re not going to be able to efficiently clean any outdoor surfaces. You can widen the spray fan, but you’re simultaneously sacrificing pressure and cleaning power in doing so. Instead, if you’re planning on pressure-cleaning your driveways to eliminate motor oil spills or get rid of slimy, slipper mildew from your porch, you’ll need the help of a surface cleaner.

PowerFit PF31023B vs Karcher 15-Inch: Surface Cleaner Comparison

PowerFit PF31023B

Today, we’re going to take a look at two surface cleaner models from two of the most popular pressure washer manufacturers on the planet: the PF31023B from PowerFit and the 15-inch 8.641 from Karcher. Not only do these surface cleaners come with side brushes for helping scrub away the most stubborn stains, but they also have high-speed jets that help in loosening and rinsing dirt, mildew, and oil spills. Since they can both be attached to many pressure washers of practically any make and model, it’s important to find out which of the two performs better. Let’s jump into our comparison.

Dual Jets

PowerFit PF31023B and Karcher 15-inch 8.641
The jets found on the bottom portion of the surface cleaner are the real magicians of a surface cleaner. They shoot out a continuous flow of high-pressure, high-concentrated streams of water than lift up and blast away whatever dirt and grime are in its path. Both the PowerFit and Karcher feature dual jets that offer five times as much power and speed when cleaning porches, driveways, and sidewalks compared to a pressure hose.

RPM

PowerFit PF31023B and Karcher 15-inch 8.641
Other than there being twin jets that spray out a continuous flow of pressurized water, both the PowerFit and Karcher’s jets can spin at speeds of up to 1,500 RPM. With each of their jets spinning at such a high speed, you can see how these attachments are the more appropriate choice for cleaning wide surfaces than just using the standard pressure hose and wand. You shouldn’t need to worry about scratching your surfaces or the jets since there’s enough clearance to compensate for any rocks or bumps in the tool’s clearing path.

Karcher 15-Inch vs PowerFit PF31023B: Surface Cleaner Comparison

Karcher 15-Inch

Cleaning Area

PowerFit PF31023B and Karcher 15-inch 8.641
Most surface cleaners on the market come in the standard 15-inch diameter, and the PowerFit and Karcher are no different. At 15 inches, they offer the same amount of cleaning area as a 25° nozzle from about 2 feet away. They both offer a tremendous amount of surface-cleaning area with every sweep. This size is perfect for making quick work out of cleaning driveways, patios, and even garage doors without causing balancing issues when working both horizontally and vertically.



Fitting

PowerFit PF31023B and Karcher 15-inch 8.641
Both of these surface cleaners use ¼-inch quick-connect fittings. This means that they are virtually compatible with every home-grade pressure washer out there. Essentially, you can own a K2 electric pressure washer from Karcher and attach the PF31023B with no problems. This isn’t an uncommon feature in surface cleaners of any brand since pressure washers more often than not come equipped with ¼-inch fittings for connecting any attachment from any manufacturer for a quick plug-and-play experience.

PowerFit PF31023B

PowerFit PF31023B

General Performance

PowerFit PF31023B
Guiding the PowerFit along smooth surfaces is simple, but 50% of the motions you make won’t produce the expected results. We’ve found that the PF31023B doesn’t work as well when pushing the tool away from you than when pulling it back. When pushing it forward, the resulting mixture of dirt and water can’t escape the side brushes.

Karcher 15-inch 8.641
As for the Karcher, there’s absolutely no problem with comfort. Whether you’re pulling the surface cleaner towards yourself or pushing it away, you can expect to see a satisfying, dirt-free path. There are also no problems when swinging the unit side to side, even when cleaning vertical surfaces like garage doors.

Conclusion: If you’ve read the other points of comparison above, then you’ll notice that up until this point the PowerFit and Karcher are identical to the t. However, when it comes to actually using the surface cleaner, there are some pretty significant differences. The Karcher offers way more convenience and comfort than the PowerFit which requires you to pull the surface cleaner to get nice, clean strokes.

Karcher 15-Inch

Karcher 15-Inch

Maximum PSI Ratings

PowerFit PF31023B
The PowerFit surface cleaner can handle a maximum of 3,300 PSI, but we find that anything more than 1,500 PSI can work relatively well. Furthermore, we found no considerable difference when using machines that provide 2,500 PSI and other models that produce greater amounts of force.

Karcher 15-inch 8.641
The Karcher has a maximum PSI rating of 3,200 PSI. The 100-PSI disparity between the two is completely immaterial in the larger picture. Like the PowerFit, we found that 2,500 PSI was the optimal amount of pressure.

Conclusion: It’s important to know the maximum PSI rating that a surface cleaner can use. Set your machine too high and you could end up breaking the dual jets. The good thing is that most home-grade electrical pressure washers don’t exceed the 2,500-PSI mark. Many gas-powered models do, so just be wary of how much power your pressure washing is packing.

PowerFit PF31023B vs Karcher 15-Inch: Surface Cleaner Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the PowerFit PF31023B on Amazon >>>

PowerFit vs Karcher: Verdict

It’s clear that there are hardly any differences in specs and features. In fact, when you look at most surface cleaners on the market, they’re most likely going to be a generic 15-inch model with dual jets and speeds of between 1,400 and 1,500 RPM.

However, despite their similarities in specs and appearance, there’s an obvious difference in performance. The Karcher 15-inch 8.641 is more user-friendly and does a better job at cleaning surfaces, both horizontal and vertical. The main issue with the PowerFit PF31023B is that you won’t achieve satisfactory results unless you pull the surface towards you rather than push it away. As for the Karcher, it works in whatever direction you handle it.

Furthermore, we found that the PowerFit, no matter how much pressure you apply (up to 3,300 PSI) will still result in streaky finishes. As for the Karcher, even when using only around 2,200 PSI of pressure will produce a squeaky-clean finish that you can be proud of.

Karcher 15-Inch vs PowerFit PF31023B: Surface Cleaner Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Karcher 15-Inch on Amazon >>>

Best Surface Cleaners: Buying Guide




Categories
Cleaning Comparison Guides Guides Pressure Washers

AR Blue Clean vs Sun Joe Comparison

Looking to do some outdoor cleaningTired of taking out the pail and scrub for laborious cleaning sessions on your patio and paved walkwaysThe best tool you can get to maximize cleaning power while cutting down time spent under the scorching sun is an electric pressure washer. With one of these bad boys in your garage, you can get to cleaning your walkways, porches, home windows, outdoor furniture, and vehicles all in a single day without breaking your back. The best thing about pressure washers, other than their efficiency, is that they’re fun to use.

AR Blue Clean AR383 vs Sun Joe SPX3000: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

AR Blue Clean AR383

In this article, we’re going to compare two highly regarded electric pressure washer models the AR383 from AR Blue Clean and the SPX3000 from Sun Joe. We’ve talked about the SPX3000 in many articles in the past, and we have yet to find a model that, in our opinion, surpasses its cleaning power. Will the AR383 finally be the tool to do itLet’s see.

PSI and GPM

AR Blue Clean AR383
The most important specs to consider when choosing a pressure washer is how much force it provides (PSI) and how much water is consumed (GPM). The AR has PSI and GPM ratings of 1,900 and 1.5, respectively.

Sun Joe SPX3000
The differences between the AR and Sun Joe are marginal. The Sun Joe produces up to 2,030 PSI while using up 1.76 GPM. However, when looking at the larger picture, the SPX3000 will use up considerably more water in the long run while producing only a little over 100 additional PSI.

Sun Joe SPX3000 vs AR Blue Clean AR383: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

Sun Joe SPX3000

Conclusion: The PSI and GPM ratings of a pressure washer surpass those of a traditional garden hose. You can get about 40 PSI at 24 GPM with a garden hose, meaning you’re not getting very much power to support the tremendous water consumption. Between the AR and the Sun Joe, their PSI and GPM ratings aren’t much different, but if you want to get technical, you can end up saving more water with the AR while producing similar amounts of pressure.

Spray Adjustment

AR Blue Clean AR383
To adjust how concentrated or wide the spray is, with the AR, you simply need to twist the wand’s nozzle. You have the freedom to choose from a 0° to 40° spray when doing this. In addition to the twisting wand, you can swap it out for a turbo orbital wand which blasts water with a 0° concentration in an orbital fashion. This will help clear grease and dirt much more easily.

Sun Joe SPX3000
The Sun Joe comes with five quick-connect spray nozzles that you attach to the end of the wand. They provide different spray angles and pressure for cleaning a wide range of surfaces. The nozzles give you the ability to spray 0°, 15°, 25°, and 40°. The fifth nozzle attachment is for dispensing soap.

Conclusion: Between the twisting nozzle and the quick-connect tips, we feel that the AR’s system is much easier to use and requires very little time to switch between high and low pressure. Furthermore, you get a handy orbital spray wand with the AR for heavy-duty cleaning when a straight 0° spray just can’t cut it.

AR Blue Clean AR383 vs Sun Joe SPX3000

AR Blue Clean AR383

Detergent Tanks

AR Blue Clean AR383
To truly get the best cleaning power out of a pressure washer, you should be able to apply a thick layer of detergent for every surface. The AR comes with a single 14-ounce detergent bottle. The bottle is detachable and easy to clean when it comes times to switch soaps.

Sun Joe SPX3000
As for the Sun Joe, you get two massive 30.4-ounce removable detergent tanks. It may seem like overkill but having two tanks is extremely useful if you’re cleaning multiple surfaces in a single cleaning session. Furthermore, having multiple tanks means you won’t need to clean them out as much if you’re going to wash different surfaces in one go.

Conclusion: Two tanks are better than one. Apart from the Sun Joe having more detergent tanks than the AR, each tank can hold onto more than two times as much as the AR’s single tank. This means reduced downtime for switching between variations of soap and refilling the tanks.

Water Inlet Temperature

AR Blue Clean AR383
The AR’s water inlet only allows you to use cold water. Even though cold water can be used for high-pressure cleaning, it won’t exactly give you that dissolving power for getting caked-on muddy messes and greasy spills.

Sun Joe SPX3000 vs AR Blue Clean AR383

Sun Joe SPX3000

Sun Joe SPX3000
The Sun Joe’s amazing system allows you to run warm – up to 104°F – water through the machine’s body and out of the wand. With warm, blood temperature water, you can easily get rid of caked-on messes in an instant. Pair this with the high 2,000-plus-PSI pressure you get and cleaning will be a breeze.

Conclusion: The dissolving power of warm water gives you an edge when cleaning paved dirty walkways, oily driveways, and even greasy car bodies. The reason we’ve favored the SPX3000 so much is that it gives your cleaning power that extra kick by safely supplying you with up to 104°F water. Not many other models are able to do this, and the AR is no exception. However, even without warm water, the AR can still perform rather well.

AR Blue Clean AR383 vs Sun Joe SPX3000: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the AR Blue Clean AR383 on Amazon >>>

AR Blue Clean vs Sun Joe: Verdict

Once again, we find another model that the SPX3000 from Sun Joe sweeps away. Not that the AR383 from AR Blue Clean is a bad product – in fact, its orbital turbo wand really does work as advertised – but it falls short performance-wise. The thing we absolutely love about the SPX3000 is that it has the ability to take in warm 104°F water to help dissolve caked-on dirt and grime.

Not many pressure cleaner models can do this, which is why we feel that the SPX3000 has the upper hand against many competing models, the AR Blue Clean AR383 included. In conclusion, the Sun Joe SPX3000 still retains the crown as the best-performing electric pressure washer we’ve had the chance of reviewing.

Sun Joe SPX3000 vs AR Blue Clean AR383: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Sun Joe SPX3000 on Amazon >>>





Best Electric Pressure Washer: Buying Guide

Pressure Washer Infographic


Pressure Washers (Recommended)
Sun Joe SPX4000 Stanley SLP2050 Sun Joe SPX3500
Sun Joe Stanley Sun Joe
SPX4000 SLP2050 SPX3500
2030 PSI 2050 PSI 2300 PSI
22 x 18 x 37 in 24.4 x 16.4 x 17.2 in 16.7 x 14.5 x 36 in
27.8 pounds 36.4 pounds 33 pounds




Categories
Cleaning Comparison Guides Guides Pressure Washers

Sun Joe SPX3000 vs Karcher K2000

The harsh elements of nature can really go Mike Tyson on the exterior of your home. In doing so, the paint of your home is prone to chipping, the pathways filled with dirt and grime, and your yards cluttered with fallen leaves and debris. A good pressure washer is key to keeping your home’s exterior, and even your car’s body, in tip-top shape. There are several benefits to owning an electric pressure washer, one of which is that regularly cleaning your home’s exterior can increase its value by up to 5%, assuming you use the pressure washer on a regular basis.

Sun Joe SPX3000 vs Karcher K2000: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

Sun Joe SPX3000

In today’s article, we’re going to take a look at two very highly regarded pressure washer models: the SPX3000 from Sun Joe and the K2000 from Karcher. They both provide around the same amount of power and use about the same amount of water, but their differences may surprise you. Let’s see which of these models comes out on top after comparing them side-by-side.

PSI and GPM

Sun Joe SPX3000
Pounds-per-square-inch is the unit of measurement that shows how much force is produced by a pressure washer’s motor, and the GPM rating determines how efficient it is at using water to provide force. The Sun Joe’s 14.5-amp motor produces up to 2,030 PSI of force while using up only 1.76 GPM of water.

Karcher K2000 vs Sun Joe SPX3000: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

Karcher K2000

Karcher K2000
The Karcher has a slightly lower PSI-rating of 2,000 PSI, but it uses considerably less water to generate that force. At any given time the machine is on and squirting water, it uses only 1.3 GPM, making it one of the most water-efficient models currently available.

Conclusion: There’s hardly any difference in PSI – 30 to be exact – but the Karcher takes the cake when it comes to efficiency in water usage. The low 1.3 GPM rating is rather surprising considering how much power the motor can generate. In the long run, you’re going to save more on water consumption with the Karcher than you could with the Sun Joe.

Detergent Tanks

Sun Joe SPX3000 & Karcher K2000
Any pressure washer model worth considering should come with an onboard detergent tank. Both the Sun Joe and Karcher come with two detergent tanks where you can place different types of soaps without having to empty a tank out beforehand. The use of various soaps is required for cleaning different surfaces (e.g., patio furniture, paved pathways, and vehicles). You’ll ultimately save more time in your cleaning tasks with multiple tanks than with a single soap-tank pressure washer model.



Water Intake Temperature

Sun Joe SPX3000
Not very many pressure washer models allow the intake of hot or warm water since it can increase the risk of overheating and ruin the motor. That’s not the case with the Sun Joe; this model can take in water of up to 104°F and shoot it through the nozzle of the wand. Warm water is much more effective at dissolving dirt clods, greasy spills, and caked-on messes.

Sun Joe SPX3000 vs Karcher K2000

Sun Joe SPX3000

Karcher K2000
The Karcher only uses water with a maximum temperature of 70°F. This mainly has to do with the cooling system inside of the K2000 which uses the flowing water to keep the engine cool and running optimally. Any water over 70°F can significantly increase the risk of overheating.

Conclusion: It may seem insignificant to many users, but having the ability to blast jets of warm water is actually a major plus. Not many pressure washers have the capacity to let the warm water flow through them, making the SPX3000 a rare model, indeed. Honestly speaking, high-pressure blasts of water can eliminate greasy spills and dirt, regardless of the water’s temperature.

Quick-Connect Nozzles

Sun Joe SPX3000
Most pressure washer models nowadays come with quick-connect nozzles that you attach to the tip of the wand to adjust how concentrated or fanned-out the spray of water is. The Sun Joe SPX3000 comes with five different nozzles: a super-concentrated 0°, a minor 15°-wide spread, a wider 25° fan, a low-pressure 40° for windows and other delicate surfaces, and a nozzle specifically for blasting suds.

Karcher K2000 vs Sun Joe SPX3000

Karcher K2000

Karcher K2000
The Karcher uses an identical quick-connect nozzle system to adjust how much pressure to spray. The only difference is that the Karcher doesn’t come with a 25° nozzle which isn’t really a deal-breaker, but you might find the 15° nozzle tip to be too concentrated and the 40° to be too spread out for certain applications.

Conclusion: The missing 25° quick-connect nozzle for the Karcher shouldn’t be something that turns you away from the model, but it’s definitely worth considering, especially since applying too much force when spraying certain objects can ruin its paint job or surface.

Hose Reel

Sun Joe SPX3000
If you ask anybody who owns a pressure washer what’s the worst thing about owning one, they’ll most likely tell you that cleanup is a huge hassle, especially if they need to wrap the pressure hose to prevent damage to it manually. Unfortunately for the Sun Joe, you’re stuck with manually wrapping the cord when you’re finishing cleaning, and you always run the risk of causing rips or tears in the hose with improper care.

Karcher K2000
The Karcher has simplified cleanup considerably with the built-in hose reel. With a turn of the handle, you can reel in the 25-foot long hose with ease. While turning the handle, all you have to do is watch as the hose comes in and coils around the reel effortlessly.

Sun Joe SPX3000 vs Karcher K2000: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Sun Joe SPX3000 on Amazon >>>

Conclusion: The fact that the Karcher K2000 comes with a hose reel is a plus in our book. With a hose reel, you’re left manually wrapping the hose around your arm or shoulder, and the hose seemingly always wants to free itself from your grasp.

Sun Joe vs Karcher: Verdict

After comparing these two models, we have to say that the better model to go with has to be the Sun Joe SPX3000. At first, the unit looks just like any other pressure washer you can find on the market, but its ability to take in warm water – up to 104°F – is truly special. Cleaning caked-on gunk and oil spills from your car and driveway is a breeze when blasting strong jets of pressurized warm water.

The Karcher’s hose reel is really a time-saver, but in terms of performance, the reel has no real contribution. If you asked us which of these models to get, we’d highly recommend going with Sun Joe’s SPX3000.

Karcher K2000 vs Sun Joe SPX3000: Electric Pressure Washer Comparison



Best Electric Pressure Washer: Buying Guide

Pressure Washer Infographic


Pressure Washers (Recommended)
Sun Joe SPX4000 Stanley SLP2050 Sun Joe SPX3500
Sun Joe Stanley Sun Joe
SPX4000 SLP2050 SPX3500
2030 PSI 2050 PSI 2300 PSI
22 x 18 x 37 in 24.4 x 16.4 x 17.2 in 16.7 x 14.5 x 36 in
27.8 pounds 36.4 pounds 33 pounds




Categories
Comparison Guides Guides Miscellaneous Planer

DEWALT DW735X vs WEN 6550 vs Makita 2012NB

Woodworkers of any level will swear that thickness planers are a crucial tool for producing the best-quality pieces of furniture. Thickness planers can be used for both dimensioning boards and final smoothing before connecting boards together. Consider a thickness planer as an investment where profits are made from the amount of lumber you can save old lumber you can salvage.

DEWALT DW735X vs WEN 6550 vs Makita 2012NB: Thickness Planer Comparison

DEWALT DW735X

In this article, we’re going to take a look at three popular manufacturers’ top thickness planer models: the DW735X from DEWALT, the 6550 from WEN, and the 2012NB from Makita. Although there are similar features across these three thickness planers, their differences really set them apart. However, one commonality that they have is customers love them due to their ability to reduce snipe. The only thing we have to ask ourselves now is which of these three thickness planers performs bestLet’s find out.

Motor

DEWALT DW735X
The DEWALT comes with a 15.0-amp motor that produces up to 30,000 CPM. The motor has two different speed settings: a quick 179 CPI speed for dimensioning boards quickly and a slower 79 CPI for final smoothing. The boards are fed under the cutterhead at a rate of 14 feet per minute, so it’s rather slow, but you can’t argue with the results.

WEN 6550 vs Makita 2012NB vs DEWALT DW735X: Thickness Planer Comparison

WEN 6550

WEN 6550
The WEN also features a 15.0-amp motor which rotates the cutterhead at a speed of up to 17,000 CPM. Like the DEWALT, the WEN’s motor can be set between two different cutterhead speeds: 179 CPI and 96 CPI. Despite the almost halved CPM of the DEWALT, the WEN has a feed rate of around 26 feet per minute.



Makita 2012NB
Just like the models above, the Makita sports a 15.0-amp motor, and similar to the WEN it delivers up to 17,000 CPM. What sets the Makita apart from the other models is that the motor only has a one-speed setting of 179 CPI, but believe it or not, the high CPI works great for both pre-dimensioning and final smoothing jobs. The Makita has the quickest feed rate of the three at 28 feet per minute.

Conclusion: Looking at their respective motors, we would have to say that the DEWALT has the best motor of them all simply because it has a super-fast cutterhead speed of up to 30,000 CPM. 17,000 CPM is by no means slow, but more cuts translates into high-quality, super-smooth finishes.

Makita 2012NB vs DEWALT DW735X vs WEN 6550: Thickness Planer Comparison

Makita 2012NB

Best Thickness Planer: Buying Guide

Cutting Capacity

DEWALT DW735X
One thing you want to consider when purchasing a thickness planer is how large board can slide under the cutterheads. The DEWALT has a maximum capacity of 13 inches wide by 6 inches thick – about the largest size you’ll get for a non-industrial-grade thickness planer.

WEN 6550
There’s hardly any difference between the WEN’s and the DEWALT’s respective capacities. The WEN can take in boards as large as 12.5 inches wide by 6 inches thick. A ½-inch disparity shouldn’t be too significant unless you work exclusively with 13-inch wide boards.

Makita 2012NB
The Makita has the smallest capacity of them all, but the difference is minuscule. It has a maximum capacity of 12 inches wide by 6 inches thick. In general, the larger the capacity, the better the model, but even 12 a foot wide there’s nothing to hate here.

DEWALT DW735X vs WEN 6550 vs Makita 2012NB

DEWALT DW735X

Conclusion: In terms of capacity, it’s pretty much a three-way stalemate. We could say that technically the 13-inch wide DEWALT is the best of the three, but it really depends on the size of the boards you work with on a regular basis, but the safest route would be to go with DEWALT’s ability to handle boards more than a foot wide.

Cutterheads

DEWALT DW735X
What really helps with producing smooth, clean finishes is the number of knives on the cutterhead. Basically, more knives mean more cuts mean smoother surfaces. The DEWALT’s cutterhead uses three reversible HSS blades. Because it has three blades, they can last for considerably longer than a dual-blade setup.

WEN 6550 vs Makita 2012NB vs DEWALT DW735X

WEN 6550

WEN 6550 and Makita 2012NB
Both the WEN and the Makita feature cutterheads that use two knives. A dual-knife setup isn’t bad at all, but it won’t be able to produce nearly as many cuts as a three-blade cutterhead. Furthermore, fewer blades combined with a quicker feed rate theoretically produces less smooth surfaces that would require multiple passes to smooth out completely.

Conclusion: It’s clear that the three-blade cutterhead of the DEWALT is superior to the WEN and Makita’s dual-blade design. The good thing is that the blades on all of these machines are reversible so you can get some extra work out of them before they need to be replaced. It’s just that the DEWALT’s blades work much more effectively and efficiently.

Makita 2012NB vs DEWALT DW735X vs WEN 6550

Makita 2012NB

Table

DEWALT DW735X
The only difference between the DW735 and the DW35X is the addition of stainless steel infeed and outfeed tables on the latter model. The base measures in at 19-3/4 inches, and with the feed tables in place, you can get an additional 26 inches of extra support. The tables are foldable and detachable to make transporting the machine easier.

WEN 6550
The granite infeed and outfeed tables that come with the WEN are also foldable to help save space during storage. Although granite weighs considerably less than stainless steel, there is no risk of it warping in shape or bending due to falling. However, if dropped from your bench, the tables could break completely.

DEWALT DW735X vs WEN 6550 vs Makita 2012NB: Thickness Planer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the DEWALT DW735X on Amazon >>>

Makita 2012NB
The Makita also has large stainless steel feed tables attached to both the infeed and outfeed of the unit. The only problem is that the tables are not foldable, meaning that the only way you can transport this unit to and from places is by detaching them.

Conclusion: Of all the tables here, you get the most support from the DEWALT’s 26-inch infeed and outfeed tables. In terms of construction, the WEN’s granite table is best unless you drop it on your foot, risking breaking both the table and your toes. The Makita would probably work best as a static thickness planer that you leave in the workshop.

WEN 6550 vs Makita 2012NB vs DEWALT DW735X: Thickness Planer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the WEN 6550 on Amazon >>>

DEWALT vs WEN vs Makita: Verdict

Between the three models – DEWALT DW735X, WEN 6550, and Makita 2012NB – we feel that you can’t go wrong with the DEWALT. In terms of handling snipe, all of these models have some issues, especially when the tables are placed incorrectly, but it won’t be a considerable problem if you follow the basic guidelines of how to run boards through these machines.

The thing that really sets the DEWALT DW735X apart from the WEN and Makita is its three-blade setup that produces up to 30,000 CPM. This makes dimensioning and final smoothing much more easily done with fewer passes under the cutterhead. It’s not that the WEN and Makita are bad models, but the DEWALT practically leaves the other models in the sawdust.

Makita 2012NB vs DEWALT DW735X vs WEN 6550: Thickness Planer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Makita 2012NB on Amazon >>>

Wood Planer Buying Guide Infographic

Best Wood Planer: Buying Guide




Categories
Cleaning Comparison Guides Guides Pressure Washers

Simpson MSH3125-S vs PS3228-S vs MS60763-S

We’ve talked extensively about electric pressure washers and how they benefit home and car owners in keeping their assets squeaky clean. One of the main benefits of using a gas-powered pressure washer is that you can basically clean any surface on earth without being tied down by annoying power cords and extension cords. Of course, the cost of gasoline is a bit pricier compared to electricity, but you also get the superior power that gas engines provide.

Simpson Cleaning MSH3125-S vs PS3228-S vs MS60763-S: Gas Pressure Washer Comparison

Simpson Cleaning MSH3125-S

In this article, we’re going to take a look at three great gas pressure washers from Simpson Cleaning. Not much needs to be said about Simpson Cleaning expect that they’re one of the leading companies of outdoor power tools, and looking at these three pressure washers we’re inclined to agree. One thing you can expect to get from these three models is the supreme power that you won’t find in electric models. Without further ado, let’s jump right into our comparison.

Engine Power

MSH3125-S
When it comes to gas-powered pressure washers, one of the main things you want to consider is who manufactured the engine. There are several companies that make engines specifically built for pressure washers. The MSH3125-2 comes with the Honda 6.0 HP 187 cc 4-stroke GC190.

PS3228-S
The PS3228-S features the Honda 5.5 HP 196 cc 4-stroke GX2000. Like any Honda engine, this one is super-quiet, easy to maintain, and can start with just a single tug of the recoil cord.

Simpson Cleaning PS3228-S vs MS60763-S vs MSH3125-S: Gas Pressure Washer Comparison

Simpson Cleaning PS3228-S

MS60763-S
The MS60763-S is different from the other two models in the sense that it doesn’t come with a Honda engine but rather an engine made by Kohler. It packs the 6.5 HP 196 cc 4-stroke RH265 which has been known to be a late starter, requiring several tugs. However, it’s a durable engine that should last you many years with very little maintenance.

Conclusion: We’re not saying that Kohler is a bad brand, but we and many other people out there consider Honda to be the king of kings when it comes to making reliable engines for gas-powered machines. In this sense, we feel that the MSH3125-S or the PS3228-S would be the safer bet to get for durability and worry-free use out of your pressure washer.



PSI and GPM

MSH3125-S
Now we’re taking a look at how much-pressurized force these machines can provide and how much water they consume. The MSH3125-S delivers an astounding 3,200 PSI at only 2.5 GPM of water. This is something you definitely won’t find from an electric pressure washer. The extraordinary power means better cleaning from a distance and even much more cleaning power when tackling caked-on messes.

Simpson Cleaning MS60763-S vs MSH3125-S vs PS3228-S: Gas Pressure Washer Comparison

Simpson Cleaning MS60763-S

PS3228-S
The PS3228-S takes it up a notch and produces up to 3,300 PSI at 2.5 GPM. The extra 100 PSI of force won’t really make much of a difference in the long run, but it’s good to know that the engine works a little bit more efficiently at providing additional force while using up the same quantity of water as the MSH3125-S.

MS60763-S
The lowest of the bunch, the MS60763-S delivers “only” up to 3,100 PSI at 2.5 GPM. Like the previous model, a 100-PSI difference shouldn’t make any difference, but it just shows that the Kohler engine is just a tad bit less effective than the two Hondas.

Conclusion: There shouldn’t be a tremendous amount of difference between 3,100 PSI and 3,300 PSI (do not try to test how powerful it is on your body). However, you can feel just a little bit more ease of mind that you’ll be able to blast tough stains away with more PSI. The general rule is that greater PSI translates into more efficient cleaning. Therefore, the MSH3125-S is the model to go with in this regard.

Simpson Cleaning MSH3125-S vs PS3228-S vs MS60763-S

Simpson Cleaning MSH3125-S

Quick-Connect Nozzle Tips

MSH3125-S, PS3228-S, and MS60763-S
Imagine blasting 3,300 PSI of pressurized water at your home’s or vehicle’s windows. It’s not a pretty thought and could potentially lead to injury. How many pressure washer models overcome the problem of damaging your property instead of cleaning it with high pressure is with the inclusion of quick-connect nozzle tips. Each of these Simpson Cleaning models in this article come with five different tips: 0°, 15°, 25°, 40°, and a soap nozzle. The angles show how far spread the blast of water is, ranging from pencil-like precision with glass-shattering force and a wide-spread fan with gentle pressure. The soap nozzle is used exclusively for applying suds on any surface to tackle the most stubborn stains.

Portability

MSH3125-S
We mentioned at the beginning of the article that gas-powered pressure washers are more portable compared to electric models since they don’t tie you down with cords. However, you need to pay attention to how mobile the unit is to ensure that it is indeed able to travel with you. The MSH125-S weighs only 72 pounds, comes with two large 10-inch pneumatic tires, and an easy-to-reach handle that lets you glide the unit on any terrain.

Simpson Cleaning PS3228-S vs MS60763-S vs MSH3125-S

Simpson Cleaning PS3228-S

PS3228-S
Like the MSH125-S, this is a beefy unit that sits atop two 10-inch pneumatic wheels. The weight of the unit, fully assembled, is around 83 pounds. The handle is easy to hold so you can drag the unit to and from various worksites.

MS60763-S
The MS60763-S is considerably more portable than the previous models. First of all, it weighs only around 67 pounds fully assembled, comes with two heavy-duty 12-inch never-go-flat wheels, and has a similar handle that makes the unit easy to cart to wherever it’s needed.

Simpson Cleaning MS60763-S vs MSH3125-S vs PS3228-S

Simpson Cleaning MS60763-S

Conclusion: Although portability isn’t exactly a deal-maker or –breaker, it’s definitely something that you want to keep in mind, especially since you’re getting an ultra-portable gas-powered machine. Of the three models here, we feel that you get the best amount and ease of movement with the “small” MS60763-S. It’s tiny body encased in a heavy-duty frame sitting atop two huge foot-long wheelsYou won’t get any more portable than that.

Simpson Cleaning MSH3125-S vs PS3228-S vs MS60763-S: Gas Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Simpson Cleaning MSH3125-S on Amazon >>>

25-foot Morflex Hose

MSH3125-S, PS3228-S, and MS60763-S
One amazing feature that Simpson Cleaning has included in all three of these models is the 25-foot Morflex Hose. It is a ¼-inch x 25-foot long hose that is non-marring, won’t tangle up on you, and is immune to abrasion and tearing. You can tug on the pressure hose without worrying about snapping it. We wish that there were a handle hose reel included in each of these units so cleaning up after cleaning up could be a breeze.

Simpson Cleaning PS3228-S vs MS60763-S vs MSH3125-S: Gas Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Simpson Cleaning PS3228-S on Amazon >>>

Simpson Cleaning Models: Verdict

There are some rather significant differences between each of these models. First of all, the Simpson Cleaning MSH3125-S and PS3228-S come with reliable, heavy-duty Honda-made motors, whereas the MS60763-S comes with a lesser-known Kohler engine. In terms of power, the MSH3125-S provides the most amount of pressurized force, though the differences are minuscule and hardly worth noting.

When looking at the overall portability and maneuverability of these gas-powered pressure washers, nothing beats the PS3228-S’s lightweight, “compact” design that rests on top of two large 12-inch wheels. However, if we had to crown one of these models as the king of Simpson Cleaning’s line of pressure washers, without a second thought, we’d say that the large MSH3125-S is the way to go, simply because the Honda engine has the greatest output.

Simpson Cleaning MS60763-S vs MSH3125-S vs PS3228-S: Gas Pressure Washer Comparison

Check how much you can save, buying the Simpson Cleaning MS60763-S on Amazon >>>